So with the Films that Click or Don't Click or Semi Click or whatever series, I try to only write six of them per year as they're easy to write, and I don't want to flood this blog with too many of these.
However, I had a lot of films that I wanted to talk about. I am a film buff after all. And so, I have a lot of films that have clicked over the years. So as a bonus episode, I thought I talk about five films that I really wanted to write about. But for whatever reason, from I didn't have much to say for a standalone review to not being able to group it with other films in a thematic way, I decided to put them on the backburner.
Amelie
God, I forgot how weird this movie is.
Romance movies are arguably the most risk averse genre out there. Unless you are a ground up subversive take like Her or Harold & Maude, you are likely going to get a straightforward story.
Amelie proves that you can get the best of both worlds. You can have a cozy romance with cute situations, quirky side characters, and a happy ending. But also, you can have a shot of a baby coming out of a vagina. A perfect film for a date night.
This film is overwhelmingly odd, sometimes arbitrarily. I have watched this film a few times now, and I still can't explain why the hell the director decided on a handful of ways they convey story bits. Part of me wants to hate it as random and pointless, but I can't. In fact, I love it.
Amelie has a unique place in the romantic genre. It's so blatantly unique but still has an air of being a really solid romance movie. It can slap you with a surreal moment but then pull right back into the easy going nature of the romance. It is like if every other scene was the tunnel scene from Willy Wonka.
Amelie is also unique in being light in plot. For a romance movie, Amelie is less interested in being a romance movie and more a slice of life where Amelie secretly interjects in the lives of those around her. This creates a lot of cute scenarios where Amelie crafts increasingly creative methods of whatever simple goal she has in mind. Annoyed by a shopkeeper that verbally abuses his employee? Well she breaks into his house and subtly fucks with his things. She wants to help a widow who didn't find closure with her husband, so she forges a letter posing as him. Some of this stuff is messed up to the point of some things being illegal which makes it so funny when it is all done by this charming lady.
Audrey Tautou perfects this role. This is a rare lightning in a bottle performance. And like everything else in the film, it's a rarity that it comes from a film like this. We've seen lightning in a bottle performances from villain roles, dramas, and biopics, but never from a romantic comedy. It's one of my favorite performances of all time.
She ties everything together. The balance of being socially awkward but not off putting. The little smirk she gives when she does something crafty which is so satisfying they use it in the main movie poster. It's the type of performance where the dedicated movie buff combs through every mannerism because every choice Tatou makes has something interesting behind it.
Originally, I was going to do a romance edition of Films That Click. And while there are a lot of romance movies I love, there are few that are interesting to talk about like Amelie. If you are a hopeless romantic that doesn't love this film, you probably voted for Trump.
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
I recall this movie being a favorite of mine early in my movie buff career. It was also the first time a movie made me fall in love with a movie director, and Milos Forman is still on that shortlist of favorite filmmakers.
It's been a while that I have watched or rewatched a Milos Forman movie. And right off the bat, it becomes abundantly clear that Forman is brilliant in scene design. You see this early on with the first scene with the entire ensemble together. You are tossed unprompted into this pure chaotic and overly stimulating scene. A lesser filmmaker would make that scene pointless and obnoxious. But with the cinematography and wonderful direction as the actors recklessly talk over each other, you got a thesis for the whole movie. Because at the center, you got two individuals unphased and collected. One of them is Nurse Ratched
Nurse Ratched. Good God, I forgot how good this character is. Before there was Professor Umbridge. Before there was that one bitch from Midnight Mass. There was this lady.
Of course, she isn't great just from her character alone. Like any great villain, she is a important ingredient that mixes with every aspect of the experience. The way she clashes with McMurphy (Jack Nicholson) and how she personifies the callous and power hunger nature of corrupt public service members is unbelievable.
It's one of the best push and pull conflicts in a dramatic movie. Ratched's strict control makes the scenes where McMurphy humanizes the patients feel earned. It's also more interesting since the vague intentions of McMurphy lends a gray quality. This isn't the cliché drama of a morally complex character that becomes good natured over the course of the movie. This does what any good authentic drama does. It asks a simple but carefully thought out question, like throwing a pebble in the precise center of a pond to create a beautiful ripple.
What happens when you throw a seemingly sane person in a room of seemingly insane people? And the ripples are complications that make the simple question harder to answer. I don't want to list off all the complications. I have three other films to talk about. But as a quick example, the scene where *spoilers* McMurphy learns most of the cast is at the mental institution voluntary puts a sudden dart in everything we thought of up to that point.
If I had one complaint, the movie drags at parts where I start to wonder if the movie needs the two hour runtime. Although, I wouldn't know how to improve it since every scene feels necessary. You can't leave out the scene where McMurphy teaches Chief basketball without also taking an important step towards understanding Chief's agency.
And to think, this film isn't even considered Forman's best film, but I will suppose I will save that for the next Films That Click. For now, know that One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest is required watching. It still remains as one of the most effective films ever made.
Seventh Seal
If there are two reasons I have such a deep love for minimalist fantasies, they would be Shadow of the Colossus and Seventh Seal.
I won't bother doing a deep thematic analysis of this film. I feel doing an analysis on Seventh Seal would be like doing a book report on Hamlet. I would at the very least be treading old ground. That being the case, there is still a lot to dig in this movie. For a famous art house movie, this movie is very enjoyable without being a dedicated cinephile. This film is watchable despite being a foreign language movie from the 1950s and would inspire more inaccessible films like Muholland Drive and Holy Mountain. Once you get past the slow pace, the movie is straightforward at a surface level.
If this were another genre, I would describe it as a post-apocalypse. There has been a lot of films set during the Middle Ages, but none have been as grueling and upsetting as Seventh Seal. There is a real savagery as people are desperate to survive and find meaning during the worst plague in human history. If there was one takeaway I had from my revisit, the execution of the setting is still as amazing as it was in 1957 even with the blatant anachronisms.
In the middle of this is Max von Sydow who plays a crusader in crisis about whether God truly exists. A plight so worthy of attention that he doesn't seem too bothered by the through line plot of him playing a life or death game of chess against the Angel of Death.
As I mentioned, the minimalist fantasy elements are great. The other stand out performance other than Max von Sydow is Bengt Ekerot as Death. The performance is iconic that one wonders why Ekerot didn't have the prolific career as Max von Sydow. Well the answer is that his cigarette addiction lead to an early demise to lung cancer, but I am getting off topic.
Part of me wished they went a tad further beyond having just a personified Death character. The most we get other than Death is a character who has second sight which is only shown a handful of times. I would have loved to see other supernatural stuff sprinkled in. But I will admit, that is merely a personal thing. I would have the same complaint for fucking Home Alone, so take that what you will.
For how accessible Seventh Seal is, this movie makes for a perfect gateway for cinephiles wanting to get into more arthouse cinematic experiences. It's a short runtime. There is a dash of levity, which while hokey now, lessens the pretentiousness some may accuse the film of.
The use of Christianity gives people a personal entry into more abstract themes. And finally, the themes themselves aren't more complex than the basic God questions everyone has asked themselves at one point. But, they are expressed in a creative way to make you approach the God questions in a different way.
And that's the nutshell to why Seventh Seal is considered an all time great. It's simple but elegantly takes the most basic philosophical questions and turns it into art.
Sideways
Since my Manhattan review, I have been thinking about movies with the same nuanced writing. They're hard to find movies with that kind of pristine elegance where the pace is natural and characters' actions don't feel at the mercy of the storyteller's hand.
The first movie I thought of with that kind of writing is Sideways. Although, I think I only thought of this one first because this one also stars very shitty and pathetic characters.
Sideways is about a week in two middle aged men lives as they go on a bachelor getaway before one of the men gets married. The knot in this string is that one is a depressed alcoholic played by Paul Giamatti and the other is a self-absorbed serial adulterer played by Thomas Church.
It's worth noting Giamatti and Church because they are the anomaly that makes this film special. Now, I don't normally think of these people as phenomenal actors. I only think of Church as being solid as Sandman in Spider-Man 3, and that's really it. Unless you are willing to stretch to include the George of the Jungle movies. And as for Giamatti, he is a decent actor, but he was always been the actor that's in every biopic to the point where it becomes distracting. I don't see his character in 12 Years a Slave or Love & Mercy. I see Paul Giamatti.
Here, both actors blend into their roles perfectly. And all around, every actor does their master work in their respective roles.
Sideways portrays this odd phenomenon in life where a mundane moment in life somehow manages to bring about an unexpected amount of contemplation, like when my 9th grade friend's birthday party at the roller skate rink turned into a plunge of how romantic longing can lead to psychotic gestures. Now, while my story just lead to an awkward conversation between my friend and his exe, Sideways has more going on.
Like Manhattan, the movie doesn't give what the characters deserve bringing a layer of realism. Giamatt's character, at best, just gets the hazy indication towards a happy ending despite easily being the more sympathetic and tragic out of the two protagonists. On the other hand, Thomas Church's character, who is the cause of virtually all the problems in the movie, gets the storybook wedding ending with no cue that he learned any lessons from the trip.
And like Manhattan, Sideways is funny. It's hard to be unsettled by the cringier moments when it is punctuated by a great gag. Well ok, the scene where Giamatti drunkenly confronts his exe over the phone is an exception and spawns flashbacks of the roller skate rink. But other than that, the movie is mostly painless.
There is a lot to take away from Sideways even if you don't personally relate to the plight of the characters. And to reiterate, the writing is amazing. I didn't even mention how this movie has one knock out monologue after another and does it effortlessly as if monologues aren't the hardest fucking thing to write.
The World of Tomorrow
Through wisdom only gained through age, I learned that there is a difference between a movie and a cinematic experience. 9 times out of 10, a lot of my favorite movies were poor cinematic experiences. That's no fault of the movies as the quality of the cinematic experience hinges on the circumstances of how the movie was viewed. Lawrence of Arabia feels much less epic when watched on an iPhone. Conversely, the worst piece of shit film becomes far more palatable when you are in the company of witty friends and a satchel of weed.
I watched World of Tomorrow in what is probably the most ideal circumstance. I was with my friends at their house. And occasionally, we will browse the Internet and watch a random thing. Usually, they were things we were somewhat familiar with. One of my friends was a trekkie, so we watched the episode that earned Star Trek its first Emmy. I like dog shit, so I made my friends sit through the God's Not Dead movies.
One day, we came across an instance where we watched something purely on a whim. It wasn't recommended to us nor connected to us in any way. It was dropped on our lap. And after fifteen minutes, we all sat there realizing that we just had one of the best cinematic experiences ever. All that was missing was the weed.
I insist that if you watch World of Tomorrow, and or its two sequels, that you watch with your closest friends. The conversations I had with my friends after we watched World of Tomorrow as a group was some of the best conversations I've ever had.
You can approach World of Tomorrow in so many angles. The movie takes fifteen minutes what would take hours to convey. There is more themes per minute than anything I've seen from a motion picture.
And the best part is that it is extremely accessible. World of Tomorrow is deep while also being extremely goofy having a Pixar short quality. You can ignore all the themes, and you can still enjoy the short as a funny back and forth between an existential clone and little girl that's just happy to have someone to play blocks with.
I have an affinity for an oblivious and innocent child paired with a deranged or cynical adult. If you will, the Spongebob and the Tattletale Strangler. I like when optimism, no matter how contrived, somehow overcomes pessimism.
And that's part of the resonance of this movie. You don't feel depressed about your prospects despite the existential material. It's uplifting that this movie instills that life is just a series of moments. The past is not tangible no matter how we dwell on it. And if we choose move on, we can find that is pretty easy to see how happy your day is.
Please watch this film. There is no excuse with this one. It's short, and it is also free on YouTube. I will leave a link
here.